World Car Blog

World Car Blog

With the launch of its all-electric E-Class entrant, the 2023 EQE-Class, Mercedes has the Tesla Model S squarely in its sights. The self-proclaimed inventors of the combustion-powered car (see 1886 Benz Patent-Motorwagen) felt no compunction to emulate any of the characteristics that helped the Model S popularize electric cars on a global scale—and which led to Tesla outselling Mercedes by 17,147 cars in 2021 to become the No. 3 luxury brand in the U.S. There's no frunk in the EQE, no Ikea minimalist interior, no record-setting acceleration or range figures, no rainbow-road or fart-noise "Easter eggs." Rather, the 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQE-Class simply aims to be the Mercedes-Benz of premium E-segment electric sedans. Should the Teslarati (or those considering an Audi E-Tron, BMW i4, Lucid Air, or Porsche Taycan) hold out for a Mercedes EQE-Class?
 

 No Rail-Gun Rocket. Yet.

The 2023 Mercedes EQE will launch in 350+ guise; the plus is meant to suggest long range, and indeed, the rear-drive 350+ with the skinnier 19-inch tires will undoubtedly travel the farthest on its 90.6-kWh battery, but no smaller battery options are planned. The hypermilers at Europe's WLTP say it's good for 660 kilometers, which we're betting will translate to something like 330 more realistic EPA miles. Mercedes says this 288-hp, 391-lb-ft rear-drive variant wafts to 60 mph in a dignified 5.6 seconds. That's a half-second-plus quicker than a Chevy Bolt, with which it shares its weight-to-power ratio. The 402-hp/633-lb-ft dual-motor EQE 500 scheduled to follow the 350+ to market before the end of 2022 drops that pounds-per-horsepower figure to base Ford Mustang Mach-E 4x levels. As such, it feels considerably quicker, but it still won't pin your head back and blur the scenery. Ludicrous acceleration is more the purview of the AMG team, which is readying an EQE 53 that'll churn out 617-677 hp and 701-738 lb-ft of torque.
 
2023 Mercedes Benz EQE 13
 

 Confident Handler

Up in the hilly Hessian countryside just outside Frankfurt, the 2023 Mercedes EQE 350+ comported itself with the poise we've come to expect from modern air-suspended big-battery e-sedans featuring low centers of gravity: confidently, with very little body roll and even less steering feel. Fortunately, what the helm lacks in road feel it largely compensates for in precision. The two-motor EQE 500's front motor helped yank it out of the corners more smartly, though the 255/40R20 tires on our base 350+ and 500 seemed to give up their grip a bit earlier than expected. We then sampled a 350+ First Edition fitted with the staggered 21s (255/35 front, 285/30 rear) that hung on with noticeably better grip (obviously at some cost to range). Note that all were branded Pirelli P Zero MO-S. Our biggest gripe with these EQ sedans continues to be the weird brake pedal, which moves on its own during regenerative braking. When moving from accelerator to brake, drivers often find the pedal already in motion. This feels unnatural, and although the brakes worked great and the pedal remained firm, a hard run down a mountain had them smelling pretty cooked at the bottom. Bottom line: Most of the listed competitors feel more lithe—as the EQE 53 AMG undoubtedly will.

EV Features

Would-be Mandalorian spaceship pilots have three synthesized powertrain noise profiles to choose from—Vivid Flux, Silver Waves, and Roaring Pulse, most of which struck the assembled journalist corps as silly. Dedicated EQ infotainment screens let the driver monitor consumption history, locate charging stations along a programmed route, opt to extend range by curtailing individual interior and climate functions or by activating ECO drive functions, and program charging times and limits. As we've noted in our first look and first ride reviews, the EQE can accept 170-kW DC fast charging (which can fill a third of the battery in 15 minutes) thanks to refrigerant cooling of the battery. Using the Mercedes Me Charge green charging network (60,000 U.S. chargers), drivers can plug and charge—free for two years—without further authentication, knowing Mercedes will offset every kWh with green energy.
2023 Mercedes Benz EQE 17

Inner Space

The One-Bow jellybean design ethos shared by the EQE and EQS pays off in impressive aerodynamic drag coefficients (0.20 for the EQS, 0.22 for the shorter-tailed EQE) but results in a high cowl that heightens these cars' feeling of heft and substance. The interior execution is also uniquely Mercedes-Benz—vastly more opulent than any Tesla and more carefully crafted than early Lucids we've experienced. That higher One-Bow roof (and a trunk that eliminates the EQS hatchback's overhead hinges) delivers reasonable rear headroom in a seat positioned at a comfortable height above the floor, unlike in some e-sedans like Lucid Air models with the biggest battery and the Tesla Model 3. Oh, and you could manufacture semiconductors in the clean air afforded by the 600-cubic-inch HEPA filter that consumes the space that might otherwise be a frunk.
 

Screentime

Technophiles may be drawn to the optional pillar-to-pillar Hyperscreen (directly shared with the EQS), but the standard setup (which shares its basic instrument-panel and infotainment screens with the combustion-engine S-Class) is preferable in many ways. The same info gets displayed, and the various trim-panel options that otherwise span the dash are more attractive. Besides, how often will your passenger really play Sudoku, Shuffle-Puck, or Pairs, browse the internet, or watch video on that third screen? (That screen now achieves safety compliance by monitoring driver eye gaze and pausing/dimming the video content if the driver looks at it.) There's also a huge, colorful head-up display that depicts more info than practically any other we've experienced. Our biggest complaint with the 2023 Mercedes EQE's interior is its almost complete reliance on capacitive-touch switches and its total dearth of knobs for volume/tuning/climate controls. At least "hey Mercedes" will handle most of what these switches do, if you can bring yourself to converse with your car.
2023 Mercedes Benz EQE 16

Should You Wait For An EQE, Arriving This Fall?

For loyal Mercedes-Benz E-Class owners looking to upgreen their ride, no other option will do. Air-quality worrywarts and screen-size braggarts will find the frunk-sized filtration system and Hyperscreen irresistible. And many new mainstream EV-buyers will be beguiled by the EQE's sumptuous interior and smooth, silent operation. But driving enthusiasts will find similar-priced and more compelling offerings from the competitors, and hardcore EV enthusiasts will be lured by the Lucid Air's innovation and efficiency.
 

Along with the information from the briefing related to the electrification of the car, a teaser image arrived from Honda announcing two new electric sports cars that will join the range of this Japanese brand.

The vehicles in the picture are still covered, although the one on the right could be the successor to the Honda NSX.

The current NSX hybrid will retire soon, but it has been rumored since last year that it will return as a fully electric model, as hinted by Acure Vice President and Brand Director Jon Ikeda.

The other vehicle on the left looks like a grand tourer. Honda announced that the two electric sports cars will be presented globally.

Honda has also revealed some details from its renewed EV plans, especially for the introduction of electric models in three main markets: North America, China and Japan. In North America, in 2024, Honda will introduce two mid-range and upper-class electric vehicles, which are currently being developed alongside GM, namely the all-new Prologue SUV and the new EV SUV for the Acura. In China, Honda will introduce a total of 10 new EV models by 2027. For Japan, Honda is considering a mini-EV model for commercial use by early 2024, followed by mini-EV and EV SUVs for personal use.

In the second half of the decade, Honda wants to introduce affordable electric vehicles (starting in North America) by 2027 through an alliance with GM. The Japanese carmaker will also start adopting Honda e: Architecture in 2026.

Honda plans to introduce 30 EV models worldwide by 2030, and the goal is to produce more than 2 million units per year. The Japanese plan to invest a total of 64 billion dollars in research and development in the next 10 years.

While we wait for the official premiere scheduled for April 13 at the fair in New York, the renewed Hyundai Palisade has already appeared in public ahead of time, in one leaked picture.

About the restored Hyundai Palisade in an earlier article.

Wednesday, 06 April 2022 05:27

Suzuki Across SUV review

 
 
 
 
 Pros
  • 46-mile electric range
  • Build quality
  • Low BiK band
 

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Firm ride
  • No choice of trims

The Suzuki Across is a plug-in hybrid family SUV that’s based on the Toyota RAV4 thanks to a partnership between the two manufacturers. It's the second rebadged Toyota in Suzuki's line-up, following the arrival of the Corolla-based Suzuki Swace.

Sitting above the smaller Vitara in Suzuki’s range, the Across is also twice the price. This might seem like a deal breaker at first but very few buyers pay for cars in cash nowadays - instead Suzuki is gunning for the company-car and leasing markets. The car is similar in price to the Hyundai Tucson PHEV, Peugeot 3008 Hybrid4 and Vauxhall Grandland X PHEV.

Thanks to the Across' plug-in hybrid's impressive electric range of up to 46 miles, it boasts an incredibly low emissions figure of 22g/km of CO2, making it the next best thing to a fully electric SUV. This reduces Benefit-in-Kind (BiK) payments for business users, making the Across a sensible choice. Claimed fuel economy figure stands at 282mpg, but what can be achieved in the real world will depend upon how often the battery is topped up and what sort of journeys you do.

The combination of a 2.5-litre petrol engine and two electric motors  gives the Across a not-insignificant 302bhp, making it the unlikely winner in a Suzuki line-up drag race. Zero to 62mph is dispatched in six seconds, but most of the time the Across prefers to favour electric power to save fuel. It handles neatly enough but the extra 300kg of the plug-in hybrid hardware means the ride isn't as smooth as we'd like. If driving fun is important, the Ford Kuga PHEV is a better bet.

Apart from a few tweaks, the interior is pure RAV4, which means it's sturdy, functional and more stylish than Toyota's of old. The nine-inch touchscreen at the base of the windscreen gets Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, solving many of the frustrations with the standard software. Standard kit is commensurate with the price, so leather upholstery, LED headlights, 19-inch alloy wheels, heated seats (and steering wheel) and adaptive cruise control are all included.

 
 

There's plenty of space for passengers, wide-opening doors, a powered tailgate and a 490-litre boot. The battery has cut into its size slightly (compared with a hybrid RAV4), but it should still be fine for most and has a flat floor, making it easy to use.

An update for the Across for 2022 introduced a larger, 6kW on-board AC charger for faster charging times. When plugged into a 7kW home wall box, you can now top up the Across in less than three hours, compared with more than five hours before. The update also includes more efficient LED lighting and upgraded USB type-C ports for connecting mobile devices.

MPG, running costs & CO2

 
A large battery gives the Suzuki Across fantastic official efficiency figures

When tested for efficiency to the latest WLTP standards, the Across' impressive electric range of up to 46 miles gives it a significant advantage over similar plug-in SUVs. Most of the plug-in hybrids currently on sale can only manage around 30 miles before their batteries are depleted and the combustion engine has to take over. 

 

On paper at least, this powerful SUV can return up to 282.4mpg. We say 'on paper' because you'll need to diligently top-up the battery and use plenty of electric running to see that figure in the real-world - just like any plug-in hybrid. On longer motorway trips, the fuel economy will start to drop as the boost from its electric driving range becomes less significant and the petrol engine has to work for longer. 

What doesn't change is the low 22g/km CO2 figure, which is the most significant figure for company-car buyers whose main running cost is BiK. Because BiK is worked out based on emissions, this makes the Across more affordable than an equivalent petrol or diesel model, and the next best thing to an all electric car. Unlike an EV, you'll still have to pay car tax, although at a slightly reduced rate of £140 a year.

One thing to consider, however, is that the RAV4 on which the Across is based comes in at a significantly lower starting price; unless you prefer the Suzuki’s more subdued styling over the bold look of the Toyota, there is little reason to choose it over the original.

Engines, drive & performance

 
The Suzuki Across is quick and handles respectably well

It may seem odd but Suzuki's ultra-economical new SUV is also its most potent model by some margin. Thanks to the combined efforts of its 2.5-litre petrol engine and electric motors, the Across has a respectable 302bhp, getting it from 0-62mph in six seconds. Although that figure is larger than that of most rivals, the Across isn't exactly sporty. When the battery is charged, the powertrain is keen to stay in all-electric mode unless you really floor the accelerator.

The transition between electric and petrol power is smooth and quiet, and the Across handles with aplomb for a fairly big plug-in hybrid SUV. Its E-Four four-wheel-drive system (with an electric motor powering the rear axle) also provides extra traction on slippery roads. 

However, to achieve this handling in spite of the hardware adding 300kg, Suzuki has clearly had to stiffen the suspension. Even on smooth roads, the suspension can be felt working hard, sometimes thumping into bumps and potholes.

Interior & comfort

 
Toyota build quality and plenty of kit makes the Across a pleasant place to spend time

It's probably here where the similarities with the Toyota RAV4 are most obvious, and for the most part that's no bad thing. Toyota has a great reputation for build quality and that's the case with the Across, with everything appearing well-finished. There are some neat design touches too: soft-touch plastics adorn prominent surfaces and the rotary controls for the climate control look smart and are easy to operate. The leather seats are attractive and feature contrasting stitching for an upmarket look. A nine-inch screen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto sits above the dashboard, making it easy to check your route at a glance.

With no trim levels as such, the Across comes with a healthy kit count - as you'd expect of a car costing more than £45,000. It includes heated leather seats and a heated steering wheel, LED headlights, adaptive cruise control, 19-inch alloy wheels and a host of safety features.

Practicality & boot space

 
A practical interior and sizeable boot makes this a family-friendly plug-in hybrid

The RAV4 has grown in recent years, which is good news for Across buyers in need of lots of space in their next family car. The doors open nice and wide, making getting in and out easy, and there are lots of storage cubbies dotted around in the doors, dashboard and centre console.

A powered hatchback reveals a boot that offers 490 litres of carrying capacity. That figure is 90 litres less than a hybrid RAV4 because of the larger battery, but it's still a respectable size and sensibly shaped. It has a flat floor, and space increases to 1,198 litres with the rear seats folded down. 

Reliability & safety

 
The Suzuki Across is based on a model already proven to be safe and reliable

The Toyota RAV4 came 11th out of the top 75 models in our 2021 Driver Power survey, with a strong score for reliability and build quality. Owners also told us life with the RAV4 was painless, with only 9.7% experiencing a fault in the first year. Of these issues, one in five were electrical. That all bodes well for the Across - although only Toyota customers have access to the brand’s up-to-10-years ‘Relax’ warranty. Meanwhile, Suzuki came a middling 14th out of 30 manufacturers, some way behind Toyota in fifth spot.

A host of safety features should mean the Across can achieve the same five-star Euro NCAP safety rating as the RAV4. Highlights include autonomous emergency braking, radar and camera-based adaptive cruise control and lane keeping assist. The E-Four four-wheel drive system also features a Trail Mode that applies the brakes to individual wheels if they lose grip, helping the Across maintain momentum and grip on slippery or loose surfaces.

 

"When it is announced that a car brand will come to Serbia, it is difficult to imagine that Volkswagen or some other company from this sector will move the factory to our country. It is possible that he will move only a part of the production because we have experience with plants that make simpler components for the German automobile industry ", says Ljubodrag Savić, a professor at the Faculty of Economics in Belgrade, for Biznis.rs.

He reminds that a few years ago, in a calmer time, we heard various stories about the arrival of Volkswagen and some other companies.

"Experience from previous times shows that there are great pre-election stories, not many of which remain. However, I cannot be categorical and claim what will happen, "Savic explains.

He states that Serbia, Croatia, Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey stood out as options for Volkswagen's arrival in that period, so that the German manufacturer would eventually opt for China, which is justified by all parameters.

"Big companies think in a completely different way. If you only have cheap labor, it is enough to do some of the components. Large companies go to China, due to significantly lower labor costs, significantly weaker environmental protection, due to financial assistance from the state. However, the most important reason is that the Chinese market is the fastest growing. The Germans have shown that they know how to make a car, but it needs to be sold and earned. "China's market potential is incomparably greater than in any other country," Savic claims.

As a possibility, he points out that in the time of broken supply chains, Serbia could position itself to take over some of the components to work in our country.

"The problem at the global level is the procurement of semiconductors, but we do not have trained workers for that job. It is time to remind you of another of the earlier pre-election promises, when it was pointed out that Mubadala will invest four billion euros in a chip factory in Serbia, "Savic says.

Our interlocutor points out that this whole story has nothing to do with Fiat, because its functioning is only maintained until the final solution, but that there will be no more production in Kragujevac even when the current crisis passes. Savic believes that this company is in a very difficult situation on a global level.

Fiat did not fail because of sanctions, nor because of the war in Ukraine, a company that has been on its feet for a quarter of a century only thanks to the help of the Italian government and their strong unions who managed to fight not only for their position but also for the company's position. . The integrations they made, including the latter with Stellantis, speak best about the business. The integration did not come about because Fiat was the leader of the business, but because it was a saving solution for them. "Since the beginning of the century, in the process of globalization, many large companies have disappeared," Savic concludes.

 
 

The verdict: The 2022 Volvo V90 Cross Country stands out in the sea of luxury SUVs as a sleek, sophisticated alternative, but some aspects of its driving experience and touchscreen system aren’t up to luxury standards.

Versus the competition: Luxury wagons have been in retreat, but the ones that remain, like the Audi A6 Allroad and Mercedes-Benz E-Class All-Terrain, follow a similar formula as the V90 Cross Country: off-road-inspired styling, extra ground clearance and standard all-wheel drive.

The V90 and V90 Cross Country are Volvo’s largest wagons, measuring as long as the automaker’s three-row SUV, the XC90. The wagons, however, have just two rows of seats with seating for five. The V90 Cross Country starts at $57,295, including a $1,095 destination charge. Optional features brought our test car’s price to $61,990 — less than the starting prices for the A6 Allroad and E-Class All-Terrain, but both those wagons come standard with more powerful six-cylinder engines and air suspensions (see these wagons’ specs compared). 

How It Drives

All V90 Cross Country wagons are powered by a new mild-hybrid drivetrain featuring a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine with a turbocharger and an electric supercharger. It’s rated at 295 horsepower and 310 pounds-feet of torque — just about the opposite of the previous turbocharged and supercharged engine’s 316 hp and 295 pounds-feet of torque. The new drivetrain gets only slightly better EPA-estimated gas mileage, with the 2022 V90 Cross Country rated 25 mpg combined versus 24 mpg last year.

 

The new drivetrain has no trouble getting the V90 Cross Country up to highway speeds, but it doesn’t have much reserve power for high-speed passing. The engine works with an eight-speed automatic that’s mostly unobtrusive, but at the beginning of my testing it stuttered a bit when kicking down to lower gears, like when passing. The more time I spent driving the car, however, the smoother the transmission felt.

The wagon rides well on smooth highways, but ride quality deteriorates on rougher roads; the car was unsettled on a stretch of pavement with multiple frost heaves. Road noise also disturbs the cabin at highway speeds. Our test car had the V90’s standard fixed suspension and optional 20-inch wheels with low-profile tires (19-inch wheels are standard). An adaptive air suspension is available for $1,200.

The Interior

Our test car’s interior had a premium look thanks in part to its light-gray leather upholstery and oak wood trim. The dashboard has relatively few buttons, with many controls routed through the vertically oriented 9-inch touchscreen. This screen layout first appeared in the 2016 XC90, and compared with the 12- and 15.5-inch portrait-oriented screens available today, it seems small.

The driver’s seat is comfortable for taller adults, though there’s not much extra headroom; the V90 Cross Country has a standard panoramic moonroof with a power sunshade, which tends to reduce headroom. Thin roof pillars, large windows and well-placed side mirrors help create good natural visibility.

The touchscreen system now runs Android Automotive OS instead of Volvo’s Sensus Connect. The Android interface is similar to Sensus Connect, if not exactly the same, but some of its onscreen fonts and menus aren’t as polished as those in typical in-car multimedia systems. The Google Maps view on the standard 12.3-inch instrument screen in front of the driver, however, looks great.

In addition to built-in Google Maps, the new OS includes the Google Assistant and Google Play store for downloading apps, provided you’re logged in with a Google account. A four-year data trial of Google Automotive Services is included, but post-trial subscription pricing hadn’t been announced as of publication. Our test car didn’t have Apple CarPlay smartphone connectivity, but Volvo said it will be added as a no-cost over-the-air software update in mid-2022. Stand-alone Android Auto is not offered, which precludes simply mirroring Android phone apps on the touchscreen.

Latest news

 
 
 

The V90 Cross Country’s rear-seat cushion is on the shorter side, and it’s set low, so taller passengers’ legs will be a bit elevated. Legroom back there is adequate, but there’s a substantial center floor hump that limits foot space for the middle passenger. Rear passengers can enjoy the full effect of the panoramic moonroof, which lets a lot of light into the cabin.

The rear backrest folds flat with the cargo floor, and when it’s down, the extended cargo floor is quite long. Even with the seats up, there’s a good amount of cargo space — 18.9 cubic feet, according to Cars.com’s cargo measurements — though the E-Class All-Terrain’s cargo area measures a bit bigger, at 21.1 cubic feet. The V90 Cross Country’s 8.3 inches of ground clearance is about 2 inches more than the V90 wagon’s, but the Cross Country’s cargo liftover height manages to remain reasonable.

Safety and Driver-Assist Features

In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety testing, the V90 Cross Country earned the highest possible score in all crashworthiness tests. Its LED headlights, however, were deemed just acceptable, the second-highest rating.

Standard active safety features include automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, blind spot warning with rear cross-traffic alert, reverse automatic braking, adaptive cruise control and Pilot Assist. Pilot Assist is a hands-on driver-assist system that can manage vehicle speed and lane positioning from 0-80 mph.

In the V90 Cross Country, Pilot Assist favors the right side of the lane, which is a bit unnerving when there’s another lane of traffic to your right. It’s a characteristic we’ve experienced in other Volvos with this technology.

Should You Buy the V90 Cross Country?

The V90 Cross Country has qualities people like about SUVs — like extra ground clearance and AWD — but without the traditional SUV appearance. If you want that look — or a third row of seats — the XC90 may be a better fit.

The V90 wagon offers good value in its small competitive segment, but its sometimes-unrefined ride, limited power reserves and unremarkable touchscreen experience hurt its luxury aspirations. The available air suspension, however, may take some of the edge off the ride, so consider this feature if that concerns you.

 

https://www.cars.com/articles/2022-volvo-v90-cross-country-review-the-almost-luxury-anti-suv-447575/

In order to save fuel, some in Germany are proposing the reintroduction of measures such as during the 1973 oil crisis: a general speed limit and a ban on Sunday driving. How effective would that be today?

Tekla Wacker, the Minister of the Environment of Baden-Württemberg, was the first to remember that: "Why don't we introduce speed limits or a 'car-free week', as was the case in the 1970s? "Then that measure proved to be effective and helped reduce fuel consumption," the provincial minister from the Greens told the German news agency dpa.

The baton was then taken over by Nina Shir, a representative of the ruling Social Democratic Party (SPD) in charge of energy and climate protection: for the Welt newspaper, adding that "this is what people can do themselves to reduce the inflow of money into Putin's war budget."

Finally, this weekend, Green Co-President Ricardo Lang said: "We need a temporary speed limit on highways, for example for nine months - until the end of the year, or until the moment when we want to become independent of Russian oil."

In a country that has car manufacturers such as Mercedes, Volkswagen or Opel, that proposal could not go unnoticed. After Riccardo Lang's statement, the Liberals (FDP), the coalition partners of the Greens at the federal level, took the floor: "It is amazing how some use the war in Ukraine to carry out their own symbolic themes," said FDP Secretary General Bijan Djir Saraj. Now is definitely the wrong time for party ideology. "

Memories of the seventies

The general speed limit and "car-free week" were first introduced by the ruling coalition of the Social Democrats and Liberals (FDP) under William Brant in 1973, in an attempt to deal with the consequences of the oil crisis after the Yom Kippur War in the Middle East. The first such action was organized on November 25, 1973, followed by three more "weeks without a car". Those who violated the ban were fined 500 marks. At the same time, the speed limit on highways is up to 100 kilometers per hour, and on highways 80. These rules have remained in force for six months.

The first "car-free week" brought pictures from Germany: thousands of pedestrians and cyclists flocked to highways, police hunted lawbreakers on foot, and even horse prices jumped, as reported by the media at the time. There were also funny scenes: some remembered to harness horses to pull cars, and Bavarian Radio reported on drivers who lived near Austria and who pushed their cars to the border to get behind the wheel and ride there.

Reduce consumption by up to ten percent

Could these measures still work today? Analysts with whom the First Program of the German public service ARD spoke estimate that a ban on driving on Sundays, combined with the introduction of a general speed limit, would reduce fuel consumption by up to ten percent. The question is, however, to what extent such a measure can be acceptable today, when more and more people are using cars due to the pandemic in order to avoid crowds in public transport.

"I think it would be difficult to implement that proposal, because many people work on Sundays today," Amadeus Bach, a researcher at the University of Mannheim, told SWR radio. It would be better, he says, if the authorities gave various incentives, for example for the use of public transport.

By the way, in recent years, almost all European capitals have symbolically designated at least one "Car Free Day" per year, giving pedestrians and cyclists the opportunity to enjoy the city center.

Environmentalists also have different opinions. Greenpeace, for example, proposes two "car-free weeks" each month in Germany, while Jurgen Resch, of the environmental organization "German Environmental Aid" (DUH), believes that it is "only symbolic", but in fact "More lasting solutions are needed to reduce fossil fuel consumption." However, in a conversation with the "Rajniše Post" newspaper, he estimated that the speed limit would make sense, because, he believes, "3.7 billion liters of gasoline and 9.2 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions would be saved every year."

The latest news from the world of the auto industry

  Just a few years ago, the number of available affordable electric vehicles was significantly smaller. Listing the EVs under $50,000 for 2024, though, is a more laborious underta...